Thursday, March 28, 2019
Oedipal Complex in Hamlet Essay -- Shakespeare Hamlet Essays
Hamlet and the Oedipal Complex  In Shakespeares  Hamlet, the  title of respect characters  important, and only flaw, is his delay. This seems to  constitute the central  wear in Hamlet. By the  exposition of tragedy, there  should exist a flaw in the character of the main hero, who is a great  personality that is engaged in a  fight down that ends catastrophically. Various   sources for Hamlets delay are given. Important issues like madness,  drab  and  cowardice are discussed, but the evidence reveals that he is capable of  swift  march, we  adjudge him as an intelligent man and can therefore conclude that  he is only pretending madness. To regard him simply as suffering from melancholy  is not a sufficient explanation as he is  gauge to avenge the death of his  father, but cannot bring himself to take action. It is obvious that the reason  for not carrying out the revenge is not due to any  incorrupt apprehensions or  dismay  of divine retribution. There is something special about    this  travail that makes it  impossible for Hamlet to carry out the deed. The inability to take action stems  from distinctive feelings within Hamlet, his Oedipal Complex.  Hamlet has the perfect opportunity to  knock off Claudius in Act 3 Scene 3, yet he  fails to seize it. He fears that killing Claudius will automatically send  Claudius to heaven without punishment. Hamlet himself remarks And  direct Ill  dot. And so a goes to heaven and so I am revenged. That would be scanned A   scoundrel kills my father, and for that I, his sole son do this same villain to  heaven. (3.3.74-78). Hamlet may believe he is delaying from fear of sending  Claudius to a heavenly  hereafter however, there are times when Hamlet could   admit killed Claudius when he was not at prayer. Claudius is not ...  ... he is delaying  out of fear is invalid. Hamlet also may have plenty of time to kill Claudius  when he is not in prayer, so any interpretation that includes Hamlets concerns  for Claudius afterlife i   s also invalid. Both of these interpretations rely on  Hamlet being witting of his actions. If Hamlet is not conscious of his  behaviour, it must be because his desire stems from that part of him in which he  is unaware, his id.  Works Cited and Consulted  Guerin, Wilfred L., Earle Labor, Lee Morgan, Jeanne C. Reeseman, and John R.  Willingham. A enchiridion of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York Oxford  University Press, 1992. Leong, Virginia. The Oedipal Complex. 06 December 1997. (07 December 1997)   Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. The Riverside Shakespeare.  ED. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston Haughton Mifflin Company, 1974.                    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.